23–26 Sept 2026
Metropol Lake Resort
Europe/Zurich timezone

Comparison of ICP-AES and XRF techniques for the analysis of chemical elements in moss samples from Kosovo

Not scheduled
15m
Metropol Lake Resort

Metropol Lake Resort

Naselba Dolno Konjsko bb, 6000 Ohrid, N. Macedonia
Oral presentation Analytical and environmental chemistry

Speaker

Prof. Musaj Paçarizi (Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Prishtina “Hasan Prishtina”)

Description

The aim of this research was to analyze the concentrations of some chemical elements (Al, Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mn, P and Zn) in moss samples, using two different analytical techniques (ICP-AES and XRF), to compare their compatibility, correlation and suitability1,2. The mean and median values for some chemical elements (Ca, K and Mn) were higher in the ICP-AES method, compared to XRF, while for the chemical elements (Fe, P and Cu) these values are very close from both analytical techniques. The comparison between ICP-AES and XRF measurements demonstrates generally strong agreement for most elements. Very strong positive correlations were observed for Al (r=0.885), Fe (r=0.899), Mn (r=0.837), P (0.842) and Zn (r=0.977), indicating that both analytical techniques capture similar spatial and concentration trends among moss samples3. The moderate correlations between analytical techniques were for Ca (r=0.701) and K (r=0.680). The appearance of copper with very weak correlation (r=0.012), suggests that the concentrations were close to the limits of analytical detection and are therefore more affected by analytical uncertainty. In general, both analytical methods show good correlation with each other for most chemical elements, as XRF offers comparable trends with the advantage of rapid and non-destructive analysis of samples, while ICP-AES remains preferable when maximum analytical accuracy is required.

Keywords: ICP-AES, XRF, moss, Kosovo, Pearson correlation.
References:
1. Fedeli, R.; Di Lella, L. A.; Loppi, S. Suitability of XRF for routine analysis of multi-elemental composition: A multi-standard verification. Methods and Protocols 2024, 7(4), 53.
2. Al Maliki, A.; Al-lami, A. K.; Hussain, H. M.; Al-Ansari, N. Comparison between inductively coupled plasma and X-ray fluorescence performance for Pb analysis in environmental soil samples. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2017, 76(12), 433.
3. Dreshaj-Lecaj, E.; Haskaj, A.; Paçarizi, M. Pollution indicators of heavy metals in the sediments of the Lepenc river in Kosovo. Environment Protection Engineering, 2024, 50(3), 77-87.

Authors

Prof. Musaj Paçarizi (Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Prishtina “Hasan Prishtina”) Prof. Flamur Sopaj (University of Prshtina) Prof. Trajce Stafilov (Ss Cyril and Methodius University) Dr Riccardo Fedeli (Department of Life Sciences, University of Siena,) Prof. Stefano Loppi (Department of Life Sciences, University of Siena,)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.